Use case · Teams

How a two-person team keeps a build organized without a PM

Two-person teams move quickly because communication is direct, but decisions still disappear between calls and chat threads. Without a shared record, both people can leave the same conversation with different assumptions.

The setup

A simple way to run it in Hark

  1. 01Share one venture

    Keep the product brief, build notes, files, links, and brand assets in the same Hark project.

  2. 02Name one next action

    Use Current state to make ownership, blockers, and the immediate next step visible to both teammates.

  3. 03Record decisions, not every task

    Use the journal for choices, milestones, and handoffs while your existing tools continue to handle detailed execution.

  4. 04Review together

    Use the short weekly review to resolve questions and catch work that has gone cold.

  5. 05Keep both agents honest

    Whoever's agent is running, the session is locked to the project you opened, an abandoned session still leaves a drafted handoff, and repo export keeps .hark/HANDOFF.md and .hark/DECISIONS.md in the repository you both work in.

Starter build

Hark’s public project page

Starter builds are coming. Until then, use Hark’s own documented build as the example structure for this setup.

View the public project page placeholder →
Use this setup

Common questions

Can I use this setup for an existing two-person team?
Yes. Import a conversation or brain dump, review the drafted project, and connect the repository when you are ready. You do not have to start from scratch.
Do all collaborators and agents see the same information?
They work from the same Hark project and Current state, subject to the workspace and project permissions you choose.
Can I try this without adding a card?
Yes. Hark starts with a 14-day card-free trial, and your work remains readable if the trial ends before you choose a plan.